The Sixth Estate

Health Canada Attempting to Poison Canadians with Homeopathic Medicines

The current anti-Harper fad in the progressive community is well and good, but I think it’s equally important to remember that the Conservatives are only the current manifestation of a pro-business, anti-government movement which has, in its present form, simply co-opted the social conservative movement. (Notice that the government is very much concerned with the usual business agenda but has dropped any pretence of being genuinely interested in the more social issues of the conservative agenda.) It was Liberal cuts, not Conservative ones, that brought us most of the way to where we are today.

In this contempt and dismissal of ordinary Canadians, the bureaucracy has been one of the political elites’ staunchest allies. Despite the long struggles to build an independent and nonpartisan civil service a century ago, the present crop of managers has surrendered their independence and integrity. Now they are the government’s chief aide in preparing pathetically insincere press releases and deceptive statistics. Although it is only a minor issue (many people will have never heard of it), recently it occurred to me that Health Canada’s criminally irresponsible homeopathy policy stands out as a remarkable case in point.

Homeopathy, as you may know, is an “alternative” medicine which has three basic claims: (1) diseases are the result of distortions in the body’s energy field, not bacteria or viruses; (2) to cure disease, you should take a toxin that causes the same symptoms as the disease; and (3) to make this toxin stronger and more effective, you should water it down. There are now hundreds of homeopathic “remedies,” for everything from the common cold to cancer. Invariably some sound ridiculous: because of Principle 2, homeopaths try to treat insomnia with watered-down stimulants, so caffeine is a homeopathic sleep aide. I kid you not.

Homeopathic dilutions are very specific: you must dilute one part of the original with 10 or 100 parts water, and each time you do it, you must shake it back and forth. 10X medicine, for instance, has been diluted 10 parts water to 1 part original, 10 times over, leaving you with a substance that is one ten-billionth medicine and all the rest water. According to homeopaths, this is still far too weak a solution. Modern homeopathic remedies have strengths like 200X or 300X. By this time it is so diluted that you would be unlikely to have a single atom of the medicine left even if your sample size was as large as the Earth.

Obviously this is a classic case of junk science, and you would think that when such superstitious, pseudo-scientific claptrap ran up against the country’s public health bureaucracy, the latter would show it the door very quickly. You would be wrong. Instead Health Canada has a special process set up to help homeopathic drugs get an indication and a Drug Identification Number — a formal approval from the government that the drug is authorized for sale and that it appears to be both safe and effective against disease.

If you subjected it to the rigorous screening trials required of real drugs, inevitably it would fail. So Health Canada has even set up a special process for approving homeopathic medicines, under which clinical proof of effectiveness is optional. Alternatively, producers can submit a bibliography of homeopathic literature as “proof” that the drug is safe and effective. The bibliography doesn’t have to include clinical trials either, by the way. In fact, the policy actually encourages companies to seek out and list obscure 19th-century quack science textbooks as “proof” of their new drug.

The above is just plain silly. But here’s the kicker. Because homeopathic medicines are supposed to cause the symptoms in a healthy person that they prevent in a sick person, invariably many of them are actually dangerous poisons, like arsenic, strychnine, etc. Health Canada has taken special precautions to keep Canadians safe: they require all remedies made with a dangerous or controlled substance to be diluted to at least 24X (10 to the 24th power).

People who remember chemistry class will immediately know why Health Canada chose this number. It’s not random. Statistically speaking, this is the point at which a dilution moves from probably containing one atom of the original drug to probably containing no atoms of the original drug. In other words, if you want to register a homeopathic medicine in Canada, you may need to prove that there is probably no chemical difference between your “drug” and a simple glass of cold water.

People with a chemistry background will also instantly recognize that if Health Canada knows enough to set its bar at 24X, they also know that homeopathy is bullshit to begin with. After all, according to homeopaths, when you dilute a toxin, you make its effects stronger, not weaker. In the end, Health Canada chose science: they said that a homeopathic remedy has to be weak enough to be chemically meaningless. But according to homeopathy, a higher dilution is actually a stronger medicine. Since by its own standards homeopathy is a genuine medication, Health Canada is mandating poisonously high drug concentrations.

They’re not, of course. And they know they’re not. Which leads to the question: why the hell is the Canadian government handing out drug approvals to homeopaths when it knows the drugs don’t work?

10 Responses to “Health Canada Attempting to Poison Canadians with Homeopathic Medicines”

  1. I would say that this is one step in ruining publicly-paid health care. Offer homeopathic treatments beside real treatments, then fund only the cheaper treatments and claim you support a strong public health system. Oh sure, you can opt for other treatments if you’re willing to pay …

  2. To be fair, Health Canada drug approvals actually ARE for drugs that are sold privately. To my knowledge no hospitals in Canada actually dispense homeopathic remedies as part of their universal coverage.


  3. chris

    It would be interesting to know who pushed this past the scientists.
    Maybe it was the minister of Science and Technology and Chiropractic.

  4. I’m not sure, chris. The present version of the policy was instituted in 2007, when Tony Clement was health minister. Another version may pre-date that. I’m not sure.


  5. chris

    I was just curious. There’s a lot of money to be made in Approved Snake Oil.

  6. [...] I even do them myself from time to time — when the Government of Canada sees fit to promote homeopathy, for instance. But the National Post‘s Junk Science week, sadly, is precisely the opposite. [...]


  7. Dr Yasmeen

    Good review and the answers are here. Yes homoeopathy is 250 yrs ago science but it is not written by non –praticnioners, if you go into histories of the founder . The authors who discovered homoeopathy were from the practising field of modern medicine of their times they were MBBSand MD doctors .They were fed up with the outcome of their results so in order to find the safe way it was discovered.
    The reference given here of chemistry is good but just take a flash of the physics studies which tells about kinetic energy. If you apply the logic of kinectic energy the answer is here in homoeopathic medicine .Each substance has its kinectic energry and it is released when bought into motion I hope this answers the question……… In homoeopathy when use Arsenic is used the actual substance atomtoo is not found so how comeit is POSION ???. Last but not the least .
    All the disease orginate due to response error in the receptor functioning & the response changes in the body occurs due to chemical release due to certain emotions which cant be documented through expirements . Here in homoeopathy we deal with it.
    In olden days science was’nt advanced so the language is not defined but now definately it can be defined .
    When taking about other conventional medicine you can go in organ failure still it is accepted why not homoeopathy ? when it does’nt even cause any such effects .
    When clinical trails conducted on rats and final trails done on sick individuals to see the outcome of rx are considered to be authenticated and then why not homoeopathy where the outcome of the treatment is directly on humans .

    That’s all I want to convey

  8. Dr Yasmeen — I think you’re badly confused about physics. I think possibly the term you’re looking for is potential energy, not kinetic energy. But in any case it’s irrelevant. You’re talking about work leading to movement. I fail to see how that would have anything remotely to do with medicine. Please don’t think that my skepticism can be overwhelmed by a mass of science-y words.

    Second, I’m terribly sorry, but all disease does NOT originate in “response error in the receptor functioning,” and responses due to “certain emotions,” whatever you mean by that. Diseases have quite a variety of causes. As for the rest, I’m afraid I really have no idea what you’re talking about.

    I’m quite happy to accept clinical trials as evidence when it comes to medicine. On the whole, I’m informed that the evidence from clinical trials — large numbers of them, not just a few picked out in isolation — suggest that homeopathic medicines are generally similar to placebos. Which is precisely what modern chemistry says should be the case.

  9. An fascinating discussion is price comment. I think that it is best to write extra on this matter, it may not be a taboo topic but usually persons are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers

  10. [...] to answer. But I thought I’d throw my hat in, too, since not merely the National Post but Health Canada currently endorses homeopathy as a suitable medical treatment for Canadians, I thought it would be [...]

Leave a Reply