The Sixth Estate

Petro-State Politics Threaten Democracy, Sovereignty, Common Sense

Another day, another Canadian oil company swallowed up by its foreign competitors. Oh well, right?

Here’s a fun fact from history: Stephen Harper used to be a Liberal activist, even after he moved to Alberta. He abandoned Trudeau over the National Energy Policy, and the NEP still provokes howls of outrage from right-wingers across the country. No National Energy Plan for Canada. On the other hand, if the Chinese approach us and offer to buy out the oil patch to serve their National Energy Plan? Well, full steam ahead! The mind boggles.

And it’s not just Harper. Here’s John Ibbitson, who would join most of his colleagues in even louder howls of outrage if the government ever, ever, ever nationalized an industry, or, just for example, started up a state-owned oil company:

Uncomfortably, [the Chinese] practice a form of state capitalism, with corporations operating more or less independently, but with government often the owner rather than simply the regulator. It’s not our way; it may not be the best way for China and other economies over time. But right now it’s the way of the world.

Tell me something, John. If “right now the way of the world” is to develop natural resources using government-owned companies, then why the hell doesn’t Canada have its own oil company anymore? Oh, we did. It used to be called Petro-Canada. It was created by the Trudeau Liberals and privatized by the Chretien Liberals. You know, those far-left big-state socialists that we hear so much about from the right.

On the same subject, it’s worth pointing out that when the immeasurably corrupt Treasury Board President Tony Clement announced a new museum dedicated to a Canadian communist who spent his career working as a doctor in revolutionary China, the right went ape-shit. Clement took to Twitter to defend himself by condemning Canadian aid workers who live in communist countries today, because as we all know, what was right yesterday is wrong today. So let me get the right-wing logic straight: Communist doctors bad. Communist oil companies good.

But I’m not just trying to make a petty political point here. If we want to be a “petro-state,” which journalists of almost all stripes are now advocating for some idiotic reason, then we need to behave like one. And petro-states have state-run oil companies. Some of them don’t really do anything other than enter into required partnerships with foreign oil companies — so that the government always has a steady revenue stream from the oil patch, taxes or no taxes. Some of them are more active, like China’s CNOOC. This strategy tends to make petro-states fabulously wealthy. Witness Norway and most of the states in the Middle East.

There’s another disturbing consequence to being a “petro-state”, though. Let’s say we approve all the current projects. Then, we’ll have an oil-patch that is almost 100% foreign-owned, largely a joint venture between American and Chinese oil companies (with Shell and Statoil thrown in for good measure). There’s one pipeline running south to the United States, and there’s another pipeline running west towards China. And then, at some point in the future, we decide to do any of the following: (a) raise taxes on oil companies; (b) regulate the industry in a far-too-late and probably futile attempt to “save the climate”; (c) require the oil industry to employ a certain percentage of Canadians, or even be a certain percentage Canadian-owned; or (d) anything else that would annoy the foreign oil companies.

And then what happens?

The record is not good on the sovereignty and the prosperity of “petro-states.” The following are “petro-states” in the grand new category of “success” that Canada is looking forward to: Saudi Arabia. Iran. Iraq. Qatar. United Arab Emirates. Venezuela. Norway. Kuwait. Kazakhstan. And so on.

Excited, yet? There’s one stable democracy on that list, other than Canada. The United States has sponsored military coups in at least two of them, sponsored totalitarian dictatorships in most of the rest. These governments know what side their bread is buttered on. They create their state-owned oil companies, their elites get a cut of the foreign companies’ profits from their respective oil fields, and most of the rest of the people live in poverty. That’s Canada’s future, ladies and gentlemen.

And the Nexen deal isn’t the beginning; we’re too late in the game to stop now except with decisive government action. CNOOC was already active in the oil patch, and it’s not the only foreign state-owned company there. It’s not even the only Chinese one. To all extents and purposes short of outright nationalization, Canada has already lost the oil patch.

And in the meantime, do you think we should be worried about the temperatures in this country, or is selling oil to communists a bigger priority?

That one’s Alert. Find your city here.

9 Responses to “Petro-State Politics Threaten Democracy, Sovereignty, Common Sense”


  1. Anne Peterson

    Mr Harper will pop into bed with anyone if it helps him cling by his dirty, bitumen grubby fingernails to power. He is trashing our real economy so he must keep the oil flowing out. We could have been Norway, but we will end up Nigeria.


  2. jrkrideau

    Ibbotson
    Back in 2010, the Conservatives moved to block the proposed hostile takeover of Potash Corp. because the company was a crucial player in the potash sector. (And because Brad Wall howled at the jobs and influence Saskatchewan would lose.)

    Translation : There were 14 seats up for grabs if Harper had approved the sale.

    Unfortunately we cannot expect any sensible moves on the part of the current government — they are just too incompetent and too ideologically blinkered.

    I noted that a few days before the Elliot Lake disaster the Feds cut their contribution to the heavy urban search and rescue squads across Canada and few days before the Danzig St shootings in Toronto they cut their funding to social programs designed to reduce gang violence in Toronto.

    I had thought, and still do, that the Harris Gov’t in Ontario was incompetent and ideologically blinkered but the Conservative Government–to get the name right — is massively outdoing them.

  3. jrkrideau — I’m inclined to agree.

    Yesterday, he had a disturbingly North Korean-ish article praising Harper’s unique ability to “exercise near-total control” over every policy front. Ibbitson thought this made Harper a powerful leader. I think that sort of managerial style, unless it’s eliminated first, invariably precedes catastrophic miscalculation. I guess we’ll see who’s right.

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/commentary/columnists/like-energizer-bunny-pm-could-go-on-and-on/article4435022/

  4. It’s okay, just wait him out, right? It’s only until 2015, Canada. Just hold out for 2 1/2 more years. What could possibly happen in 2 1/2 years?


  5. jrkrideau

    That article you reference above seems more like a press release than anything.

    I think I agree that
    The Prime Minister has gone from being an inexperienced newcomer in foreign affairs to one of the developed world’s longest-serving heads of government.

    That is not necessarily a good or a bad thing.

    However what we have for Mr. Harper’s long tenure is: Several fossil awards for our ‘outstanding’ efforts dealing with climate change and the ignominy of not getting elected to the UN Security Council, for what I believe was the first time since its inception.

    Perhaps the PM’s most outstanding accomplishment in the foreign affairs realm was getting the Canadian Forces kicked out of Camp Mirage, a freely provided transit camp from Canada to Afghanistan, in Dubai. This was rumoured to cost the Canadian Conservative Gov’t around 300 million dollars as the military scrambled to find an alternative . Canadians now need visas to visit Dubai and the rest of the UAE.

    And if my memory and a wiki reference can be trusted the Cdn Minister of Defence and Chief of Staff were even refused landing rights in the UAE about then. Nothing humiliating there.

    And I almost forgot his determination to hold China to a high level of human rights responsibility, well for a couple of year until it finally penetrated that it was hurting trade.

    With a “longest serving head of government” like this who need a rookie?

  6. Most of his columns are like that these days. Between him and Wente, I really have to wonder what the Globe & Mail’s agenda is. And there’s someone even worse in their Ottawa news (but unfortunately her name is escaping me at the moment… I’ll take a chunk out of her later).

  7. My view, at the CDFAI’s “3Ds Blog”, note “Comments”:

    “What the Dragon Really Wants to Gulp From the Canadian Oil Patch”
    http://www.cdfai.org/the3dsblog/?p=1297

    More on the friendly Chinese government:

    ‘“Rapid Fire July 25, 2012: South China Sea Scenarios”’
    http://www.cdfai.org/the3dsblog/?p=1301

    Mark
    Ottawa


  8. Mogs

    And check this one out….

    http://www.terracedaily.ca/go9593a/ENBRIDGE_DONATIONS_TO_BC_POLITICAL_PARTY

    The man has not changed since I was a boy.

  9. I’m sorry, Mogs. What you say about Carruthers personally may be true, but I really can’t let this blog descend into those allegations against people who aren’t politicians.

    At the very least, I have no intention of being the subject of a SLAPP suit.

Leave a Reply