The Sixth Estate

Margaret Wente Returns, Issues Yet Another Apology for… “Careless Mistakes”

The Globe & Mail’s resident plagiarist and cheap-shot artist Margaret Wente has finally resurfaced after a mysterious two-week disappearance, with a typically vapid column on the U.S. election. Strangely, the Globe & Mail seems to be introducing an extra-special moderated comment format just for Wente. They also had her print yet another vague non-apology, referring to the fact that she’s been doing this a long time (13 years!) and that she “apologizes” for the fact that she’s made some “careless mistakes.” Due to the ongoing link boycott, you will have to find your own way to Wente’s column.

It’s certainly better than Wente’s last attempt at an apology, a vague brush-off which implied that the people accusing Wente of plagiarism really just had a vendetta against her because of her politics. However, I’m still not happy with this continuing reference to a few “careless mistakes.” Which mistakes, precisely? Is Wente now acknowledging that she lifted material from more than just Dan Gardner? If so, on how many times does she think this occurred?And is this sort of performance, from one of the nation’s senior columnists, really something that can be captured with the phrase “careless mistake”? Wente, and the Globe, seem very reluctant to use the “P-word.” They shouldn’t be. Confession is good for the soul, or so the Scots say.

Plus, since she doesn’t actually explain what she’s apologizing about in any detail whatever, presumably there will be at least some readers who find their way to this column and aren’t even sure what she’s apologizing to them about in the first place. In which case, one has to wonder, yet again, how one ought to accept this “apology.”

In any event, I thought it would be nice to do what I can to get it all out in the open. The following is a list of recent Wente columns (and some older ones), noting, where I come across one, any allegation that has been made regarding quote-lifting or other “careless mistakes.”

Some may think I’m just continuing to further the political vendetta against Wente. No, what I’m doing is showing readers just how sorry Wente really is. After all, if she’s reached the point where she’s willing to apologize for “careless mistakes,” we ought to know how many mistakes there are, so that we know how sorry she is. Plus, just to show that this isn’t a political vendetta, I thought it would be best to include all of Wente’s work, and just some annotations regarding plagiarism and other problems. Because I think, as you cast your eye down the list, you will find yourself agreeing that Wente is indeed a highly original, insightful, and thought-provoking columnist, and that the nation’s media would be a smidgeon poorer without her three-times-a-week contributions.

I’m linking to all of the articles despite the ongoing link boycott, but only because it seemed appropriate. And so, without further ado, I give you a compendium of the wisdom of Margaret Wente:

Update: In case readers are new to this series of posts, or it’s otherwise unclear, links to alleged evidence of plagiarism sometimes go to posts here at Sixth Estate, and in many other cases go to Media Culpa who, as I have previously stated on many occasions, has been largely responsible for documenting alleged misconduct by Wente to date.

  • Fat is Good For You (September 22, 2012) — Actually, all she manages to find in this article is a couple of doctors willing to say that fitness might be more important than dieting for health outcomes and some studies that cast doubt on a hard-and-fast link between obesity and mortality.
  • Canada was right to close its Iran embassy (Sept. 11, 2012) — Wente joins a chorus of right-wing voices in hailing the government for closing off any possibility of talking formally with the Iranian government, since it will never be necessary and wouldn’t do any good anyways. Features the biggest logical failure of all time, when Wente argues that “the Canadian embassy… couldn’t save the Americans who took refuge in the Canadian embassy back in 1979. Courage and bravery did that.” Yup. Verdict: possible plagiarism.
  • What I learned at university (Sept. 8, 2012) — In which the usually anti-university Wente waxes nostalgically about her low-cost liberal arts education back in the 60s, when professors were “erotic.” Bonus: “Logic humiliated me.”
  • Hope and change won’t cut it now (Sept. 6, 2012) — Wente’s “love affair” with Obama is over because spending is out of control. It’s okay, but you could have got pretty much the same column from any run-of-the-mill American right-wing columnist.
  • Being rich is hard (Sept. 1, 2012) — Wente regales us with tales of life on her upper-middle-class country estate, including how she and her husband maintain a pond, plant a meadow, and are currently trying to grow a “giant pumpkin.”
  • Why kids need to fail to succeed in school (Aug. 31, 2012) — Wente interviews Paul Tough on one of her favourite subjects: jacking up expectations in our nation’s failing and incompetent schools. He is not, to my knowledge, actually a teacher. No matter!
  • The separatists are coming (Aug. 28, 2012) — “The vampire is arising from its grave,” says Wente of the impending electoral victory of PQ leader Pauline Marois. She makes no real attempt to understand why people might vote PQ, just laments that English Canada didn’t “put a stake through” the party when it had the chance.
  • Liberal churches are dying (Jul. 28, 2012) — True, if hardly news: churches have been talking about it for years now. The hilarious original version of this article referred to the U.S. Episcopalian Church as the equivalent of our United Church.
  • Wente tours the slums (Jul. 21, 2012) — Wente ventures into the inner city in search of explanations for a shooting in Toronto.
  • Free my yard sale! (Jul. 17, 2012) — Wente is upset that Health Canada product safety regulations technically apply even to secondhand goods purchased at garage sales.
  • What if women don’t need guys anymore? (Mar. 24, 2012) — In which Wente argues that the fact that there are more single mothers in American cities, coupled with higher male unemployment rates, means that women don’t need men anymore, but that this leaves women feeling “demoralized and inadequate.” Verdict: plagiarism.
  • God’s far from dead in the global south (Dec. 24, 2011) — Wente says what any priest, pastor, or minister in the world could have told you: that the churches in developing countries are growing while the churches in wealthy countries are shrinking. Verdict: plagiarism.
  • Why your children can’t do math (Dec. 15, 2011) — Too much public schooling, that’s why. In a crass and classless conclusion, Wente declares that “the biggest losers aren’t your kids, of course. The biggest losers are the kids of parents who can’t afford tutoring.”
  • Climate theatre of the absurd (Dec. 13, 2011) — Wente is “relieved” that we are “doing nothing about climate change,” because it’s cheaper to do nothing than to do something.
  • Calling Dr. Clavicle (Nov. 29, 2011) — If we didn’t have to pay for healthcare for poor people, then rich people wouldn’t have to wait in line at the clinic when they fall off their horses and break their bones. Seriously: this is her argument.
  • Wente endorses a Conservative candidate (May 31, 2011) — And the candidate is the rabid hyper-partisan Christopher Alexander, whom I’m sure is making all his former colleagues in the normally soft-spoken diplomatic corps very proud. Verdict: plagiarism.

12 Responses to “Margaret Wente Returns, Issues Yet Another Apology for… “Careless Mistakes””

  1. More stellar work. The verdict is indeed in. If the Globe hasn’t lost all of its credibility, it is certainly on its way.

  2. excellent work here lololo

    …………………

    Deleted by Sixth Estate

  3. Copy and paste is not cool, Nadine.

    Jymn — Yes, well, it looks like Wente was given two weeks off and is now back on pace — thrice per week again? If so, at least I know what I’ll be writing about three times per week for the next little while. There’s more than enough additional material to work with in that respect.

  4. SE – what bothers me most is the lesson Globe & Mail is sending to young journalists and journalism students.

    Instead of teaching that it is never OK to plagiarize and by calling it a ‘careless mistake,’ Wente and Stackhouse are rewarding bad behaviour and encouraging a form of amoral journalism, if you will.

    Two weeks off is a vacation – not a penalty.

  5. Depressing, isn’t it? To make matters worse, at least one academic came out in defence of Wente — Margaret Somerville. Essentially the Globe is implying that plagiarism and sloppiness isn’t great, but at the end of the day is still acceptable in the modern media workplace.

    And then, when we call them on it, they thumb our noses at us and tell us that as the “real” professionals in this field they can decide the standards for themselves, thank you very much.

    The division between bloggers and professional journalists isn’t new, but the fact that the bloggers have so explicitly been permitted the moral high ground on this one is a little bit bizarre.

  6. I appreciate the listing of Wente’s recent columns. The Globe & Mail makes it difficult to find a list of their columnists’ work.

    My concern is about the columns where you indicate plagarism has, or may have, occurred. It appears that these judgements reflect the work of the Mediaculpa blog: http://mediaculpapost.blogspot.ca/2012/09/plagiarism-and-margaret-wente-reprise.html . This blog played a significant role in exposing Wente’s journalistic sins, such that The Globe and Mail had to take them with some, although insufficient, seriousness.

    So I wonder why you simply provide the links to Mediaculpa, but do not otherwise provide attribution. Attribution is called for; otherwise one could read your blog, and unless they clicked over to Mediaculpa, assume you had made these assessments with regard to plagiarism yourself, rather than relying on the work of another blogger, to whose site you provide the links.

    I’m not suggesting you intended to be misleading or to appropriate wrongly the work of Mediaculpa, but the irony of not referencing in actual words, as well as links, that blog is hard to miss.

    Daly de Gagne

  7. Daly — I should perhaps have made it clearer in this post (and in fact I’ll make clear in an update). You have my apologies for that.

    For what it’s worth, my reasoning is this. First of all, I’m not actually taking credit for the work at those links. There are the links. Second, and more to the point of my thinking as I put this together over the last few days, is that I think you’ll find if you read my many posts on this subject that I usually start off by pointing out that the heavy lifting has been done by Media Culpa.

    For both of those reasons, it certainly was not my intention to give any impression that I was ripping off Media Culpa here, and if I’ve written it in a way that gives that impression, I apologize sincerely and will add a statement to ensure that nobody else takes away that impression.

  8. Apology accepted.

    I don’t know you, but your response suggests you’re pretty classy.

    Thank you.

    Daly


  9. blair

    what about this one – http://www.nytpick.com/2009/07/did-globe-and-mail-columnist-steal-from.html

    interestingly enough from 2009 and interestingly enough, the globe refused to comment when it was brought to their attention.


  10. me-me-me-its-all-about-me

    Margaret Wente’s latest column (Oct 13th – “The awful truth about social programs”) comes in revolutionary new ‘Lock-Down’ format for the comments section where the G&M actually monitors the comments and weeds out the ones it doesn’t approve of.

    Of course we all know why this was done.

    I can’t comment on any plagiarism issues (probably not too many given Marg’s recent experience).

    The column itself was a “Straw-Man” column where Marg contends that most (all?) social welfare programs to help the poor aren’t being monitored. Her solution (surprise!) is to suggest we start monitoring them.

    From the people I know who work in this field there does actually seem to be a lot of reports and forms to fill out each year when applying for a government grant to keep operating. So if we believe Marg, the question, “What results have you achieved?” isn’t asked.

    And Marg paraphrases city officials in writing, “City officials admit that because of the lack of basic information, it’s impossible to evaluate the impact of these investments.” Did anyone REALLY say that?

    And leaving that question aside for the moment, does this imply Marg is eventually going to write a column on the foolishness of canceling the Long Form Canada Census a year or so ago? That seems to be a logical conclusion from what she is saying.

    And there seemed to be a grammar issue in one of her sentences, “Yet as I toured the neighbourhood, it struck me that the residents already got a lot of help.”

    “got” ??

    Let me borrow from http://www.dictionary.com on the usage of “got”:

    “For nearly 400 years, forms of get have been used with a following past participle to form the passive voice: She got engaged when she was 19. He won’t get accepted with those grades. This use of get rather than of forms of to be in the passive is found today chiefly in speech and informal writing.”

    Standards seem to be falling at the G&M in more ways than one.

  11. blair — Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I’ll take a look and include it, if appropraite, when this list gets updated.

    me-me-me — That’s the thing I was referring to here as the “extra-special moderated comment format,” yes. One assumes it’s maintenance-intensive enough that they’ll go back to the regular comments format once they think Wente is out of danger. Kind of silly, though.

    Regarding the most recent column, I’m already working on it. Check back tomorrow. :-)

  12. [...] for the Globe & Mail, Canada’s supposed paper of record. First it tried to suppress the Margaret Wente plagiarism scandal. Then it let one of its home sales writers publish an article promoting the sale of her own home. [...]

Leave a Reply